In partnership with

{{rh_onboarding_line}}

🌀 The Decode

You're standing in a shop, looking at two nearly identical jackets. Same material. Same warmth rating. One costs three times as much as the other. You buy the pricey one anyway because of what it signifies.

We've all experienced this. Picked the coffee shop with exposed brick over the fluorescent-lit chain. Paid extra for "artisan" bread. Waited months for sneakers we could have replaced in minutes.

The odd part isn't that we do it. It's that we can't quite explain why. Something deeper than logic is at work here. What if the things we buy aren't really about the things at all?

Earn Your Certificate in Real Estate Investing from Wharton Online

The Wharton Online + Wall Street Prep Real Estate Investing & Analysis Certificate Program is an immersive 8-week experience that gives you the same training used inside the world’s leading real estate investment firms.

  • Analyze, underwrite, and evaluate real estate deals through real case studies

  • Learn directly from industry leaders at firms like Blackstone, KKR, Ares, and more

  • Earn a certificate from a top business school and join a 5,000+ graduate network

Use code SAVE300 at checkout to save $300 on tuition.

Program starts February 9.

🏺 Field Notes

The Kwakwaka'wakw people of the Pacific Northwest Coast practiced a tradition that puzzled European colonisers: the potlatch. During these ceremonial gatherings, a chief's status was determined not by how much they owned but by how much they gave away.

Families would spend years gathering blankets, carved copper shields, canoes, and food. Then, at a potlatch, they would distribute it all to witnesses and guests. The more generous the gifts, the higher the host's standing. Some chiefs even destroyed valuable goods just to show they could afford to.

Chief Jim Humchitt (Kodi of the Dzawad’enuxw First Nation) pictured with ceremonial regalia, including a potlatch bowl, masks, a talking stick, and a button blanket. Kingcome Inlet, 1926. Texte zur Kunst 133.

Colonial officials found this incomprehensible. They banned the practice from 1885 to 1951, calling it wasteful. What they missed was that the Kwakwaka'wakw weren't merely exchanging goods; they were exchanging meaning. Each gift conveyed a story: family histories, ancestral rights, social obligations. The copper shields, called tłakwa, had individual names like "All-Other-Coppers-Are-Ashamed-to-Look-at-It." Objects were more than just objects. They were characters in ongoing narratives.

We haven't moved beyond this. We've simply shifted to a different stage.

🧩 First Principles

The anthropologist Mary Douglas, in her 1979 book The World of Goods, suggested something radical: we don't purchase things to satisfy needs. We buy them to "make visible and stable the categories of culture."

A washing machine, Douglas argued, is never merely an appliance. It also represents prestige, domestic competence, and middle-class status. What you purchase reveals who you are and who you are not. Consumption acts as communication.

Jean Baudrillard further developed the idea. He contended that in consumer society, objects possess what he termed "sign-value," meaning they exist independently of their usefulness. We purchase items not for their function but for what they represent. The entire economy operates on this logic of signs: style, prestige, identity, and belonging.

Your morning coffee isn't just caffeine; it's a statement about your aesthetic, your values, and perhaps your income bracket. The brand logo on your shirt isn't mere decoration; it's dialect.

We believe we're buying products, but in reality, we're seeking stories to share about ourselves.

🏙️ The Agora

In 2011, outdoor brand Patagonia published a full-page advert in The New York Times on Black Friday, the busiest shopping day of the year. The headline: "Don't Buy This Jacket."

The advert highlighted the environmental impact of their product: 135 litres of water, significant carbon emissions, and two-thirds of the jacket's weight in waste. It encouraged customers to consider carefully before purchasing.

The result? Sales increased by 30%. By 2012, revenue reached $543 million.

This isn't as paradoxical as it sounds. Patagonia wasn't selling jackets; they were selling a narrative where buying less made you a better person, and purchasing from them proved you understood the stakes. The product became evidence of membership in a particular worldview.

This is the modern potlatch. We no longer give away blankets to gain status. Instead, we buy intentionally, conspicuously, and narratively. Every purchase subtly performs an aspect of our identity.

⚡ Signals

📜 Quote: "People don't buy goods and services. They buy relationships, stories, and magic." — Seth Godin

📊 Study: Neuroscientist Paul Zak found that compelling stories trigger the release of oxytocin, the same hormone associated with trust and bonding. When participants received synthetic oxytocin, they donated 56% more money to charity. Stories don't just persuade us. They chemically reshape how we relate to others.

🎨 Artifact: The Patagonia "Worn Wear" tag is the label on their resold, repaired secondhand gear. It transforms a used jacket into a badge of environmental virtue. The story of previous ownership becomes the selling point.

😂 Meme: Spending $7 on coffee because the cup says "locally roasted" while skipping the $2 grocery store brand that tastes identical. Your latte is a lifestyle.

🤔 Prompt: What's the last thing you bought that you didn't need but couldn't resist? What story were you telling yourself?

📝 Reader's Agora

Think about your most treasured possession, something you'd save in a fire. Chances are, it’s not the most costly item you possess. It's the item with the best story.

Hit reply and tell us: Which object do you own that matters more than its value? We’re gathering these. The best ones might influence a future issue.

🎯 Closing Note

Here's the uncomfortable truth: every time you swipe your card, you're not just making a transaction. You're casting yourself in a story. The brands know this. The platforms know this. The question is whether you know it.

This isn't necessarily a negative thing. Humans have always used objects to communicate meaning, from Kwakwaka'wakw copper shields to Instagram flat-lays. The risk arises when we forget we're doing this, when we confuse the story with the object.

Next time you're about to make a purchase, pause. Ask: Am I buying a product, or auditioning for a role?

The jacket can't turn you into an adventurer, but selecting it already reveals a story about who you aim to become.

If this made you think, share it with someone who needs to hear it. And if you want more cultural decoding each week, make sure you're subscribed.

Subscribe to Culture Decoded for weekly insights on modern behavior.