🌀 Who Writes the Script?

{{rh_onboarding_line}}

The room is ridiculous. Floor-to-ceiling windows overlooking Manhattan, a whiskey glass catching the light, and Logan Roy, a patriarch, predator, is the king on the phone.

One call. That is all it takes.

On the other end, a presidential candidate learns whether his career lives or dies tonight. It is Succession, Season 3, and the scene is so outrageous it feels almost like a satire. A media guy deciding who gets to be president of the United States? No way.

Except it does not feel that unreal when you know your history. The fictional Roy family was inspired by a real one. And the question at the center of that phone call is: who actually gets to set the terms of political reality? It is not that big of a plot twist. It is the oldest trick in the information business.

If you’re a decision maker at your company, you need to be on the bleeding edge of, well, everything. But before you go signing up for seminars, conferences, lunch ‘n learns, and all that jazz, just know there’s a far better (and simpler) way: Subscribing to The Deep View.

This daily newsletter condenses everything you need to know about the latest and greatest AI developments into a 5-minute read. Squeeze it into your morning coffee break and before you know it, you’ll be an expert too.

Subscribe right here. It’s totally free, wildly informative, and trusted by 600,000+ readers at Google, Meta, Microsoft, and beyond.

In 1898, William Randolph Hearst owned the New York Journal and was locked in a circulation war with Joseph Pulitzer's New York World. When the USS Maine sank in Havana harbor under unclear circumstances, both papers ran fabricated atrocity stories and drumbeat headlines blaming Spain.

The New York Times later condemned what it called “the shameless fabrications of the yellow journals." But by then, the country was at war. The phrase popularly attributed to Hearst: "You furnish the pictures, and I'll furnish the war," may be skeptical, but the logic behind it was real enough.

Sell sensation, shape opinion, move nations.

That was one man and one newspaper. In 1983, fast forward to the late twentieth century and the Telecommunications Act of 1996 blew open the floodgates for media mergers, roughly 50 companies controlled 90% of American media. By 2011, that number had collapsed to just six. The names changed over the decades; mergers, acquisitions, rebrands, but the concentration of power only tightened. Hearst needed a printing press. His successors needed a holding company.

Today the view is, if anything, more concentrated. Disney, Discovery, Fox, and Netflix control the bulk of what Americans watch, read, and stream. Local journalism, meanwhile, is in free fall. Newspaper jobs have dropped roughly 80% since 1990, with over 3,200 papers closing since 2005.

And then there is the Murdoch empire, the real-life model for the Roys. Rupert Murdoch inherited a single Australian tabloid at 21 and built it into a global machine spanning Fox News, the Wall Street Journal, the New York Post, and The Sun.

In 2023, Fox paid $787.5 million to settle Dominion Voting Systems' defamation suit, the largest known media defamation settlement in U.S. history. Internal records showed hosts privately called the election fraud claims they aired "mind blowingly crazy," but broadcast them anyway to hold onto viewers.

The Murdoch succession drama itself recently settled and three siblings accepted roughly $1.1 billion each to walk away, letting Lachlan take control. As journalist Gabriel Sherman put it:

Rupert's dream was to build a family business; what he built was a business that destroyed his family.

Here is the actual insight most people miss: the danger is not just a single billionaire with a bad agenda. The danger is the system that makes only one phone call, real or fictional, so powerful in the first place.

When a handful of institutions control what gets broadcast, what gets buried, and what gets framed as "the debate," every editorial decision becomes a political act.

Whether or not anyone in the boardroom admits it.

Logan Roy doesn’t need to tell you what to think. He just needs to decide which stories reach your screen and which ones don’t. That is the main logic of modern media concentration: not censorship in the old-fashioned, blacked-out-headline sense, but something quieter.

The news doesn’t tell you what to believe; it tells you what is worth believing in. And when the menu of options is written by six companies, a few billionaire families, and an algorithm optimized for engagement, "free choice" starts to feel like choosing between items on someone else's grocery list.

Democracy does not die in darkness. It dies in a scripted narrative owned by someone whose name you will never see at the end of a newspaper.

Fiction tracks reality: Logan Roy's king-making phone call mirrors a century-old pattern, from Hearst's war headlines in 1898 to the Murdoch family's documented influence on elections across three continents.

Consolidation is accelerating: In 1983, fifty companies controlled 90% of U.S. media. Today, a half-dozen conglomerates dominate, while over three thousand local newspapers have shut down since 2005.

The settlement said it all: Fox's $787.5 million payout to Dominion proved a network can broadcast claims its own executives call false and survive, because the audience is the product.

Watch the machine, not the man: The problem is not one bad billionaire. It is an ownership structure that lets a single phone call shape what an entire country considers "the news."

The news only tells you what to think about. So the next time you feel perfectly informed, stop and ask yourself: who wrote the script?

If this gave you chills, share it with someone who needs to hear it. And if you want more cultural decoding each week, make sure you're inside the circle.

Subscribe to Culture Decoded for weekly insights on modern behavior.