🌀 When the Truth Has a Group Chat

{{rh_onboarding_line}}

You come across a thread at 1 a.m. where someone reveals that a recent news event was secretly staged. Hundreds of comments flood in from strangers, all convinced and referencing the same details.

You don't agree. But you keep scrolling.

It's not the evidence. The "proof" is shaky, and you know it. What grips you is the feeling beneath: a roomful of people who claim to see what the rest of the world won't.

Conspiracy theories rarely win arguments on facts. They win on friendship. Behind every wild claim is often something more ordinary: a group of people who finally feel they belong.

Social media doesn’t facilitate exploration. You find a topic which interests you, swipe and then see 10 AI videos with fruit. 

heywa rewards curiosity. Ask it a question about Stonehenge and it will build you a visual story curated for your learning style. Want to go deeper on one angle? Here’s a new story about the Druids. Curious about something similar? A story about the winter solstice. And there’s no need to reprompt. 

heywa is designed to send you down knowledge rabbit holes without diverting your attention into twenty different directions. 

Try heywa for free

In the months leading up to the 1947 Partition of India, neighbors who had shared meals for many years started passing strange rumors about each other. Hindus heard that Muslims were planning massacres, while Muslims heard the same about Hindus. Most of these stories were false, but they still spread widely.

Anthropologist Veena Das spent decades researching how these rumors functioned. In Life and Words, she illustrates that these stories served more than just the purpose of sharing information; they were about feeling connected to a community. Repeating a rumor indicated allegiance to a certain group, while questioning it could lead to social exclusion.

What appears paranoid from the outside, Das argues, often serves as glue from the inside. Shared suspicion creates a shared identity. The story matters less than the act of telling it together.

She traced the same pattern following Prime Minister Indira Gandhi's assassination in 1984. As violence erupted against Sikh families in Delhi, rumors spread that Sikhs were poisoning water and seeking revenge. None of these claims was true, yet their spread fuelled the violence.

The lesson is unsettling. Conspiracy talk doesn't just describe a community. It builds one. And once built, it can be very hard to leave.

The philosopher Hannah Arendt saw something similar from a different perspective. Writing in 1951, after fleeing Nazi Germany, she asked why ordinary people were so willing to believe extraordinary lies.

Her answer was loneliness.

This isn't the usual kind of experience. It's a deeper sense of feeling "superfluous," cut off from neighbors, work, family, and faith. When people feel detached from a shared world, they begin to distrust their own senses. They crave stories that explain the chaos and offer a side to support.

In The Origins of Totalitarianism, Arendt explained that loneliness, previously limited to the elderly or marginalized, had become common in the daily lives of modern people. She identified it as the environment that fosters the development of totalitarian movements.

Her diagnosis travels well. Today's conspiracy communities don't need secret police. They just need lonely people and an app.

When someone feels isolated, a podcast claiming to "expose the truth" offers more than just answers; it also provides a sense of community. The enemies of the tribe are often vague yet powerful figures, such as bankers, scientists, journalists, and "elites." Defining the boundary is simple; you don't need much knowledge to be part of it, just a willingness to believe.

A 2024 Northeastern University survey of more than 124,000 Americans found that 78.6% agreed with at least one item on the standard conspiracy-thinking scale. Nearly one in five agreed with all four items.

But the more telling finding was about how belief actually spreads.

Following the July 2024 assassination attempt on Donald Trump, researchers inquired about where people first heard the competing theories that Democrats staged the shooting or that Republicans did. Most people encountered these ideas on social media. However, those who believed them were much more likely to have heard them from someone they knew personally.

Social media planted the seed. A friend, a cousin, or a coworker made it real.

Meanwhile, audits of TikTok's algorithm (paywalled) reveal that the platform guides users from mild curiosity into increasingly narrow rabbit holes, where each new video reinforces the previous one. The feed begins to resemble a company.

Whether it's a wellness influencer linking seed oils to a hidden agenda, a Telegram channel decoding world events, or a group chat spreading election rumours, the structure remains the same. The "truth" is a side door. The room behind it is full of people who are glad you came.

📜 Quote: "The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the convinced Communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction (i.e., the reality of experience) and the distinction between true and false (i.e., the standards of thought) no longer exist." — Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism

📊 Study: A 2024 Nature Communications study followed 2,200+ Norwegians for nearly three decades. Those whose loneliness increased from adolescence onwards were significantly more likely to hold conspiracist worldviews by midlife.

🎨 Artifact: "Do your own research." A phrase that began as good advice and became a password, a way to mark yourself as someone who doesn't trust the official one.

🤔 Prompt: What's a belief you hold mostly because of who else holds it?

Have you ever drifted towards or away from a community because of what it asked you to believe?

We tend to argue against conspiracy theories the way you'd argue about a maths problem, using counter-evidence, sources, and links. It almost never works.

That's because the theory was never really the point. The community was. The shared enemy, the inside knowledge, the feeling of being seen are what the facts have to compete against.

Once you notice that, the question shifts. It stops being 'why do they believe this?' and starts being 'what are they getting from belonging to it that the rest of us aren't offering?'

The water we swim in is full of lonely people. Sometimes that includes us.

If this resonated with you, forward it to someone who understands how lonely the modern world can feel.

Subscribe to Culture Decoded for weekly insights on modern behavior.