🌀 The Vought Effect: When the Meltdown Became the Message

{{rh_onboarding_line}}

Welcome to the very first issue of Culture Decoded: Screen Edition! Starting today, you’ll get the Screen Edition every Monday.

Remember, if you want, you can decide which Culture Decoded editions you’d like to receive. Just click on the “email preferences” at the bottom of the email, and choose.

A man wrapped in the American flag stands at a podium. He's blond, blue-eyed, jaw like a campaign poster. The crowd loves him. He says something unhinged on live television: not a gaffe, but a calculated meltdown. His handlers panic. His approval ratings spike.

You've seen this scene. Maybe on Amazon Prime. Maybe on the news.

In The Boys, showrunner Eric Kripke has said the quiet part out loud: Homelander was always a political analogy. A figure who discovers that "the more awful public figures act, the more fans they seem to be getting." His power isn't the laser eyes. It's the fact that being unfiltered is the brand.

But here's what's uncomfortable: Homelander isn't fiction's warning about the future. He's fiction catching up to the present.

Let's rewind to September 26, 1960. Chicago. Kennedy and Nixon walk into the first ever televised presidential debate. Seventy million people watch. Nixon is pale, sweating, wearing drugstore makeup that melts under the lights. Kennedy is bronzed and rehearsed; he'd arrived hours early to check the lighting and room temperature.

People who listened to the radio thought Nixon won. People who watched on TV chose Kennedy. A 2003 experiment by James Druckman at Northwestern confirmed it: TV viewers judged debate winners based almost entirely on personality. Radio listeners actually weighed policy.

That was the night politics became a visual product. But it was still a polished one: scripted, controlled, focus-grouped.

The Boys shows what happens in the next phase. Homelander doesn't win by being polished. He wins by dropping the act. In Season 3, he murders a protester on live television, and the crowd cheers. The lesson Vought's PR team didn't want him to learn: authenticity (even violent, unhinged authenticity) outperforms polish every time.

That's not satire. That's a business model.

In the real 2024 U.S. presidential race, both campaigns ran like content studios. Trump's McDonald's stunt generated over 200 million TikTok views. Harris's team turned rival gaffes into viral edits. Candidates deployed trending sounds, meme formats, and influencer partnerships as core strategy, not supplements, and the data tells the darker story. A Harvard Kennedy School study of 51,000+ political TikTok videos from the 2024 cycle found that toxic, highly partisan content consistently attracted the most engagement, even with moderation in place. The algorithm doesn't reward good governance. It rewards the meltdown.

Vought International has a fictional streaming service (Vought+), a cinematic universe (VCU), theme parks, and a Fox News-style propaganda network. The company doesn't just manage heroes, it manufactures reality. Sound familiar? Replace "Compound V" with "content algorithm," and Vought's playbook maps onto real-world media-political ecosystems almost perfectly: create the narrative, control the platform, sell the hero.

Here's what The Boys gets right that most political commentary misses: the problem isn't one bad leader. It's the infrastructure that makes leaders into products.

Homelander doesn't succeed because he's powerful. He succeeds because Vought built an entire system (media, merch, PR, data) designed to make the public love whoever they put at the center. The hero is replaceable. The machine isn't.

That's the real Vought Effect. It's not about politics becoming entertainment. It's about entertainment logic becoming the operating system of politics. The algorithm, the content cycle, the engagement metrics, they don't care what you believe. They care what you click on.

And the scariest character in The Boys was never Homelander. It was always Vought.

Eric Kripke told Rolling Stone Homelander "has always been a Trump analogue." Season 3 just stopped pretending otherwise.

Harvard researchers studied 51,680 political TikToks from 2024. The finding nobody was surprised by: toxic partisan content won the algorithm every single time.

Vought has its own streaming service, cinematic universe, theme park, and news network. Now remove the superpowers and tell me which real company you're thinking of.

Homelander's approval ratings going up after a public meltdown is supposed to be satire. We literally rewarded the same thing IRL and called it "authentic leadership."

Be honest: when was the last time you engaged with a political moment for the policy and not the content?

The Boys isn't a warning. It's a mirror with better production value.

We live in a world where political campaigns are content strategies, approval ratings are engagement metrics, and the line between governing and performing has essentially collapsed. The infrastructure that turns people into products doesn't require Compound V. It just requires a feed, a camera, and an audience willing to keep scrolling.

The protagonists in The Boys (the actual Boys) are just regular people with no powers. Their only weapon is refusing to buy the story. That's the whole point.

Maybe it's ours too.

If this made you think, share it with someone who needs to hear it. And if you want more cultural decoding each week, make sure you're subscribed.

Subscribe to Culture Decoded for weekly insights on modern behavior.