🌀 The Ick

{{rh_onboarding_line}}

Three dates in, and it's going well. She's funny, she listens, she has a bookshelf. Then the bus pulls up early, and she runs for it.

Arms slightly wrong. Little hops. A face you've never seen her make.

By the time she's aboard, smiling back at you, something in your chest has quietly closed. She did nothing wrong. She'll never know what happened, and honestly, neither will you.

The internet calls it the ick: attraction killed instantly by something trivial. A tiny gesture just ended a romance. The real question is what the flinch says about the one who flinches.

The best HR advice comes from those in the trenches. That’s what this is: real-world HR insights delivered in a newsletter from Hebba Youssef, a Chief People Officer who’s been there. Practical, real strategies with a dash of humor. Because HR shouldn’t be thankless—and you shouldn’t be alone in it.

Sign Up Free

In the imperial court of Heian Kyoto, around the year 1000, you could fall in love with someone you'd never seen. Aristocratic women lived behind screens, so courtship ran entirely on paper. A suitor sent a short poem, and the woman judged him on his calligraphy, the cleverness of his verse, and the quality of his paper before deciding whether to reply.

The stakes stayed high after the first night together. Custom required the man to send a morning-after letter, the kinuginu no fumi, and the affair lived or died on its execution. Columbia's Asia for Educators puts it plainly: affairs succeeded or failed according to the sensitivity of the poems and the beauty of the handwriting.

Heian writers even kept ick lists. In The Pillow Book, the court writer Sei Shōnagon cataloged the small behaviors that curdled her regard, like a departing lover noisily hunting for his fan at dawn instead of leaving gracefully.

Read functionally, the logic holds up: when rank decided marriages and faces stayed hidden, a tiny aesthetic failure was the only available window into character. The detail carried real information, so the detail got to decide.

The sociologist Erving Goffman described everyday life as theater: each of us performs a front-stage self, polished for the audience, while the unrehearsed self waits backstage. Early dating is front stage at maximum wattage. You're attracted to a performance and so are they.

The ick is the moment the curtain snags. Running for a bus can't be rehearsed. For half a second, the backstage body bursts into view, ordinary and mortal, and the spell built on the performance takes the hit.

That's the generous reading. The less generous one: the ick can be an exit ramp dressed as instinct. Deciding you want to leave requires reasons, conversations, guilt. A wave of involuntary disgust requires nothing, because nobody argues with a reflex.

Both readings agree on one thing. The flinch happens in the watcher. The runner just ran.

The word has a longer résumé than TikTok suggests. It surfaced on Ally McBeal in 1998, got an episode title on Sex and the City in 2004, and went properly viral when Olivia Attwood used it on Love Island in 2017. By 2020, it was a TikTok genre of its own, with creators reciting lists of disqualifying behaviors to millions of strangers.

In 2025, it finally got a peer review. Researchers at Azusa Pacific University found that 75 percent of women and 57 percent of men reported having experienced the ick, with triggers as small as a man Shazaming a song in a nightclub. The sharper finding pointed back at the perceiver: people prone to the ick scored higher on disgust sensitivity, narcissism, and perfectionism.

The platform layer matters too. Ick lists turn private flinches into shared standards: once "dangling legs off a barstool" appears on a viral list, viewers start scanning their own dates for it. The crowd now writes the disqualification criteria, and everyone dates under its eye.

Quote: "When you've seen a boy, and got the ick, it doesn't go... it's caught you, and it's taken over your body. It's just ick. I can't shake it off." Olivia Attwood, Love Island (2017).

Study: In a 2025 study of 125 single adults, the tendency to catch the ick correlated with the perceiver's own disgust sensitivity, narcissism, and perfectionism, suggesting the reaction describes the judge as much as the judged (Collisson, Saunders and Yin, Personality and Individual Differences, 2025).

Artifact: The viral ick list. Running for a bus, clapping when the plane lands, chasing a ping-pong ball: a communal catalog of ordinary human movements, reclassified as evidence. Sei Shōnagon kept hers on paper; we keep ours on a For You page.

If the ick reveals more about the person who feels it than the person who triggers it, why does it arrive feeling like objective truth? And what happens to courtship when millions of people share one crowd-sourced list of disqualifying gestures?

A thousand years ago, a love affair in Kyoto could die of bad handwriting, because handwriting was the only evidence available. Today, the evidence is everywhere: we've seen the profile, the feed, the curated everything. The run for the bus is the one thing left that wasn't staged.

So the ick lands at the exact moment a performance turns into a person. The flinch is real, and it's still a choice what you do with it.

You can read the unrehearsed moment as a flaw in the show. Or you can notice it's the first true thing they've shown you.

If you also got the ick from someone, forward it to that person, so maybe they’ll understand.

Find yourself in the next one,

Eren.