In partnership with

🌀 The Decode

You open the camera app. Your face appears, skin smoothed, eyes widened, jawline sculpted by invisible hands. You didn't ask for this. The filter was already on. For a split second, you look like you, but better. Then you flip to the unfiltered view, and something feels off. Not wrong, exactly. Just less.

At this moment, the flicker between filtered and real occurs billions of times daily. It raises a strange question: when we can look "better" at the tap of a screen, what happens to the face we were born with? More unsettling still: if everyone's performing authenticity, does authenticity even exist anymore?

Media Leaders on AI: Insights from Disney, ESPN, Forrester Research

The explosion of visual content is almost unbelievable, and creative, marketing, and ad teams are struggling to keep up. Content workflows are slowing down, and teams can't find the right assets quickly enough.

The crucial question is: How can you still win with the influx of content and keep pace with demand?

Find out on Jan 14, 2026, at 10am PT/1pm ET as industry leaders—including Phyllis Davidson, VP Principal Analyst at Forrester Research, and former media executive Oke Okaro as they draw on their deep media research and experience from ESPN, Disney, Reuters, and beyond.

  • The forces reshaping content operations

  • Where current systems are falling short

  • How leading organizations are using multimodal AI to extend their platforms

  • What deeper image and video understanding unlocks for monetization

Get clear insight and actionable perspective from the leaders who built and transformed top media and entertainment organizations.

🏺 Field Notes

Humans have worn masks for at least 9,000 years. But we've never used them quite like this.

In ritual mask traditions, the mask didn't hide identity; it transformed it. MIT anthropologist Graham M. Jones describes masks as "tools of transformation that allow wearers to transcend themselves, taking on timeless roles in ritual dramas." Among the Kwakwaka'wakw of the Pacific Northwest, dancers wore masks with hinged faces that could open mid-performance, revealing another face beneath. The transformation was the point.

Nakoaktok dancers wearing the masks of the mythical birds Notsuis and Hohhug during the Kwakwaka'wakw Hamatsa ceremony. Photo: Edward S. Curtis / The North American Indian Source: The Public Domain Review

The anthropologist Claude Lévi-Strauss studied mask rituals across Salish-speaking Indigenous groups and found a common thread: masks facilitated "temporary yet profound shifts in identity," often during life transitions like coming-of-age ceremonies. The mask marked a threshold between who you were and who you were becoming.

Beauty filters operate differently. They don't announce a transformation; they conceal it. The change occurs quietly, automatically, before we even agree to it. We're not becoming something else; we're becoming a slightly better version of ourselves. The mask pretends it isn't there.

🧩 First Principles

The philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre had a useful concept for our current predicament: mauvaise foi, bad faith.

Bad faith, in Sartre's framework, is the lie we tell ourselves about who we are. It's the waiter who plays at being a waiter so perfectly that he forgets he's a free human being choosing his actions. It's the denial of our own freedom by pretending we're fixed, finished, determined.

Sartre's well-known example involves a woman on a first date who keeps her hand in her companion's grip, acting as if she doesn't notice it's there. She's neither accepting nor rejecting the advance; she’s suspending her own agency, acting as though the situation is happening to her rather than with her.

Beauty filters create a similar suspension. We're neither accepting nor rejecting our faces. We exist in a permanent in-between: aware that the filter is on, aware we look different, yet scrolling and posting as though this is just how we look now.

Sartre would call this a flight from freedom, the freedom to choose how we present ourselves, to own our appearance as a project rather than a product. When the algorithm determines what "better" means, we outsource that judgment entirely.

What do Tom Brady, Alex Hormozi, and Jay Shetty all have in common?

They all have newsletters.

If you’re building a personal brand, social can only take you so far. Algorithms glitch. Reach tanks. But a newsletter gives you real ownership and revenue.

That’s why we built a free 5-day email course that shows you how to grow and monetize with sponsorships, digital products, and B2B services.

Usually we charge $97, but for the next 24 hours it’s free. Sign up for the course today.

🏙️ The Agora

The irony is thick: we're obsessed with authenticity precisely because we're drowning in artifice.

TikTok's Bold Glamour filter, launched in February 2023, has been used by more than 400 million users. Unlike older filters, it's seamless, with no glitches and no apparent signs. It thins noses, plumps lips, and smooths skin in real-time so convincingly that users can't tell where their face ends and the algorithm begins.

Meanwhile, BeReal, the app that demands unfiltered photos within a two-minute window, has experienced rapid growth in popularity as a direct response to Instagram's curated perfection. Its premise is radical simplicity: no filters, no edits, no do-overs. Just you, right now, as you actually are.

But here's the twist. A 2024 study from CHI found that even on BeReal, users still curate. They retake photos. They adjust their appearance slightly before the shot. They wait for better lighting. The researchers found that "participants recognized that the act of photographing itself could be considered a form of filtering."

We've built an app specifically to mitigate performance issues. And we perform on it anyway.

A 2024 study published in Royal Society Open Science found that beauty filters don't just make people look more attractive; they make them appear more intelligent, trustworthy, and sociable. The filter doesn't just change your face. It changes how the world reads your character.

⚡ Signals

📜 Quote: "Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth." — Oscar Wilde, The Critic as Artist (1891)

📊 Study: Researchers found that 90% of women aged 18–30 report using beauty filters on social media, with links to decreased self-acceptance and altered self-perception.

🎨 Artifact: The "retake counter" on BeReal, which reveals the small number of times you re-shot your "authentic" moment before posting.

😂 Meme: Every "no filter" Instagram caption posted alongside perfect lighting, professional angles, and three hours of skin care.

🤔 Prompt: When was the last time you saw your face without any screen mediation, no mirror, no camera, no reflection at all?

📝 Reader's Agora

We’re curious: Do you use filters? Not judging, genuinely asking. When did you start, and have you noticed it changing how you see your unfiltered face? Hit reply and tell us.

🎯 Closing Note

Here's the paradox at the heart of our filtered age: the more tools we have for self-presentation, the less sure we become about what the "self" even is.

Ancient masks transformed identity through ritual, a threshold you crossed with intention. Modern filters transform identity through default, a threshold you cross without noticing.

Maybe authenticity was never about showing the "real" you. Perhaps it's about being awake to the performance, choosing your masks consciously rather than letting them choose you.

The filter can stay on. Just know it's there.

Subscribe to Culture Decoded for weekly insights on modern behavior.