🌀 Care Economies: Who Heals the Healers?

{{rh_onboarding_line}}

A nurse finishes a 12-hour shift. She's held a dying patient's hand, charted at 2 am, and skipped lunch twice. On her phone, a wellness app pings: Have you practiced self-care today?

She stares at it in the car park.

We've built an entire economy around being cared for. Therapists, doctors, nurses, aides, coaches, counselors, and baristas who ask how your day is going. Someone is always tending to someone.

But the person doing the tending? They're supposed to take care of themselves.

This week, we're asking a strange question. In a society obsessed with care, who actually cares for those who care for us, and why is the answer so often ‘‘nobody’’?

The smarter your AI chatbot of choice seems to get, the more wordy it’s response. It’s Tuesday night and you need dinner inspiration, not an essay. 

heywa flips that. Ask about modern interiors, filter by your vibe and receive a visual story that actually generates new ideas. 

No long paragraphs of text to crawl through, just visual inspiration that matches how we actually explore.

Try heywa for free

The Aché, a foraging people of eastern Paraguay, solved a version of this problem long before hospitals were established.

A. Magdalena Hurtado and her colleagues spent decades studying how Aché people survive. Aché hunting is brutally unpredictable. One man might spend six hours in the forest and return empty-handed. Another stumbles upon a peccary and returns with a feast.

If each family ate only what their own hunter caught, many would starve on bad days.

The Aché don't do that. Food is shared widely across families. Most of what a hunter brings home is eaten by other households. The meat moves in loops. Tomorrow, when he fails, someone else's kill feeds his children.

Hurtado and her co-authors frame this as reciprocal altruism. It only works because giving flows both ways over time across the whole group.

Notice what the Aché don't do. They don't celebrate the best hunter and leave the others to starve. They don't tell a tired forager to "practice better self-care." They don't treat one person's luck as a private asset.

The care system is the group itself. No individual is expected to ensure their own survival alone.

The sociologist Rhacel Salazar Parreñas, whose family migrated from the Philippines, has spent her career tracing what she terms the international division of reproductive labor, also known as the global care chain.

Here's how it works. A lawyer in New York hires a Filipina nanny to care for her children. The nanny, now working 60 hours a week far from home, hires an older woman in Manila to care for her children. That woman, in turn, relies on her own mother or an even younger relative.

Care flows upwards. The lawyer's child receives abundant warmth. The nanny's child receives whatever is left. The care doesn't vanish, but it is extracted from one place and delivered to another.

Parreñas' insight is that care isn't a feeling. It's a resource, and like any resource, it has to come from somewhere. When we pretend otherwise, we don't stop the extraction. We simply stop seeing it.

Now apply this to your local hospital. The nurse pours care into her patients. The hospital piles on productivity targets for her. Her own depletion is treated as a private problem: get more sleep, try therapy, download Calm.

The care chain ends at her.

The figures are stark. A 2023 survey of U.S. healthcare workers found that nearly half met the criteria for burnout, and 41% of nurses intended to leave their jobs within two years. Physician burnout peaked at nearly 63% during the pandemic and remains close to half.

The dominant response has been self-care, now a roughly $450 billion global industry of apps, supplements, bubble baths, and breathwork courses. Meditation subscriptions, gratitude journals, and a lavender candle that smells like "you deserve this".

Then came the AI helpers. Woebot, Wysa, and now ChatGPT itself are used by millions as quasi-therapists. People are literally asking chatbots to carry their emotional weight because the humans who are supposed to carry it are too exhausted, too expensive, or too booked to take on new clients.

Notice the pattern. The problem is structural; too much care is demanded from too few people, with nothing flowing back. The solution we keep buying is individual: fix yourself, alone, in your apartment, preferably with a product.

It's a system that burns out caregivers, then sells them scented candles.

📜 Quote: "Caring for myself is not self-indulgence, it is self-preservation, and that is an act of political warfare." — Audre Lorde, A Burst of Light, 1988

📊 Study: A 2024 analysis of 43,000 U.S. healthcare workers found that workload overload increased burnout risk by nearly 3x across clinical and non-clinical roles alike.

🎨 Artifact: The Pinterest "self-care checklist" candles, tea, face masks, and journaling. A tidy visual substitute for the community, rest, and structural support it's replacing.

🤔 Prompt: Think of the most caring person you know. Who cares for them?

Who's the person in your life who always holds the group together? The parent, friend, colleague, or coworker that everyone leans on?

The Aché figured it out in the forest. Parreñas traced it across oceans. Lorde wrote it from a hospital bed.

Care isn't a feeling you summon alone at the end of a long day. It's a circuit. If it flows only outward, it runs dry. If it flows back, even a little, everyone survives longer.

The real question isn't whether caregivers should "self-care" more. It's whether we're willing to rebuild the loops: checking on the nurse, the teacher, the therapist, the mother, and the friend who always asks first. Those who carry others usually don't ask to be carried. That's exactly why we have to notice.

Whom are you going to carry this week?

If this issue made you see the weight room differently, share it with a friend who never skips leg day or philosophy day.

Subscribe to Culture Decoded for weekly insights on modern behavior.